Has my stock been accused of fraud?Join over 160k users who know.

Ticker Price Change($) Change(%) Shares Volume Prev Close Open Gain($) Gain(%)
Ticker Status Jurisdiction Filing Date CP Start CP End CP Loss Deadline
Ticker Case Name Status CP Start CP End Deadline Settlement Amt
Ticker Name Date Analyst Firm Up/Down Target ($) Rating Change Rating Current

News

Xilio Therapeutics Announces Phase 2 Data For Vilastobart In Combination With Atezolizumab Continues To Demonstrate Differentiated And Generally Well-Tolerated Safety Profile

Author: Benzinga Newsdesk | November 07, 2025 09:17am
40% ORR in heavily pre-treated patients with MSS mCRC without liver metastases and with high plasma tumor mutational burden (TMB)Estimate 55% of patients with MSS CRC have high plasma TMB, representing a meaningful

40% ORR in heavily pre-treated patients with MSS mCRC without liver metastases and with high plasma tumor mutational burden (TMB)

Estimate 55% of patients with MSS CRC have high plasma TMB, representing a meaningful population with high unmet need

Company to host conference call and webcast on Monday, November 10, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. ET with leading cancer experts to review the data

WALTHAM, Mass., Nov. 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:XLO), a clinical-stage biotechnology company discovering and developing tumor-activated immuno-oncology therapies for people living with cancer, today announced new data from its ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating vilastobart, a tumor-activated, Fc-enhanced anti-CTLA-4, in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A 40% objective response rate (ORR) was demonstrated in heavily pre-treated patients with MSS mCRC without liver metastases and with high plasma TMB (≥10 mutations/Mb), as well as a statistically significant correlation between plasma TMB status and response. These new clinical data are being presented in a late-breaking poster presentation (Abstract # 1315) today at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) 40th Annual Meeting, taking place from November 5-9, 2025, in National Harbor, Maryland.

Promising Opportunity for Plasma-Based TMB as a Biomarker Predictive of Response to Combination Treatment with Vilastobart in Patients with MSS mCRC Tissue-based TMB has demonstrated potential as a biomarker predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in many tumor types. However, tissue-based TMB assays have not shown predictive utility in MSS mCRC historically, and these tissue-based assays may underestimate the mutational burden in patients. In particular, tissue-based assays are limited to evaluating mutations in a single-site biopsy specimen, which is typically taken once at the time of diagnosis, and cannot account for tumor heterogeneity or changes in TMB over time. Newer plasma-based assays show potential to better assess TMB status and be used as a biomarker predictive of response in patients with MSS mCRC. These plasma-based assays are more sensitive than traditional tissue-based assays in that plasma-based TMB assays provide a comprehensive assessment of mutational load and account for tumor heterogeneity. In addition, plasma can be readily obtained from blood samples throughout the course of treatment, accounting for changes in TMB over time without the need for invasive procedures. Approximately 55% of non-MSI-H CRC patients were plasma TMB high (>10 mutations/Mb) based on an analysis of the GuardantINFORM real-world clinical-genomic database in approximately 8,000 patients who received the Guardant360 Liquid (Infinity) assay and who had non-MSI-H disease and a reportable TMB result. In contrast, historical data for tissue-based TMB assays have suggested <10% of patients with MSS mCRC were TMB-high. These data support the meaningful opportunity to use plasma-based TMB as a biomarker predictive of response to combination treatment with vilastobart in patients with MSS mCRC. New Data from Phase 2 Trial for Vilastobart in Combination with Atezolizumab in Patients with MSS mCRC Without Liver Metastases and with High Plasma TMB As of a data cutoff date of May 12, 2025, 44 patients with MSS mCRC had been treated with the combination of vilastobart at 100 mg once every six weeks (Q6W) and atezolizumab at 1200 mg once every three weeks (Q3W), including 27 patients without liver metastases. Patients were heavily pre-treated, with 80% having previously received three or more prior lines of anti-cancer therapy. In a retrospective analysis, 24 patients without liver metastases were evaluable for plasma TMB status. Baseline plasma TMB was assessed using the Guardant360 Liquid (Infinity) assay, and patients with TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb were defined as having high plasma TMB. Clinical Efficacy Data 40% ORR in patients with MSS mCRC without liver metastases and high plasma TMB, with statistically significant correlation (p=0.05) between plasma TMB status and response. 40% ORR in plasma TMB-high patients, consisting of six partial responses (PRs), with five confirmed PRs (with one confirmed after the data cutoff date) and one unconfirmed PR. In patients evaluable for plasma TMB status, 62.5% were TMB-high. All responders who were evaluable for plasma TMB status were TMB-high, and the correlation between plasma TMB status and response was statistically significant (p=0.05). As previously reported, responses were deep and durable, with reductions in target lesions of up to 71% from baseline. Safety Data Vilastobart in combination with atezolizumab continued to demonstrate a differentiated and generally well-tolerated safety profile. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were primarily Grade 1 or 2, consistent with the tumor-activated design for vilastobart. As previously reported, across all patients treated as of a data cutoff date of May 12, 2025 (n=44), the combination of vilastobart at 100 mg Q6W and atezolizumab at 1200 mg Q3W was generally well-tolerated. Treatment-related AEs were primarily Grade 1 or 2. Only two patients (5%) discontinued treatment for the combination of vilastobart and atezolizumab due to a treatment-related AE, and only three patients (7%) experienced colitis of any grade. Clinical Development Plans for Vilastobart Based on the promising clinical activity and safety profile demonstrated by vilastobart as a combination therapy, including in patients who had high plasma TMB, Xilio is actively seeking a partner to develop vilastobart in combination with PD-(L)1 or PD1-VEGF in MSS CRC and other tumor types.

Posted In: XLO

CLASS ACTION DEADLINES - JOIN NOW!

NEW CASE INVESTIGATION

CORE Finalist