| Ticker | Status | Jurisdiction | Filing Date | CP Start | CP End | CP Loss | Deadline |
|---|
| Ticker | Case Name | Status | CP Start | CP End | Deadline | Settlement Amt |
|---|
| Ticker | Name | Date | Analyst Firm | Up/Down | Target ($) | Rating Change | Rating Current |
|---|
Crypto's entered uncharted territory, or maybe off-charted is more apt. An Uptober that didn’t happen, a flash liquidity cascade that did, cratering prices for bellwether coins, and a year's worth of Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) gains – gone.
You can feel it in the ETF flows too; polite redemptions that signal something less than panic but more serious than boredom.
Plenty of perennial optimists are still waving the Everything-Is-Fine flag. Tom Lee's spreadsheets say one thing; Michael Saylor's cosmic conviction says another; but the broader market pulse suggests that crypto's expected arc has, at minimum, taken a detour.
When narratives are fluid and liquidity is in retreat, smart investors seek expert counsel. The problem – and its one the crypto industry hates to admit – is that the advice on offer is often unfit for purpose.
A new survey from DeFi infrastructure firm Zerohash makes this painfully clear. Young, affluent crypto investors aren't marginally dissatisfied with their advisors, they're sacking them – and at a scale that should set off alarm bells in the wealth-management establishment.
The headline numbers are blunt:
This isn't a minor service-gap problem. It's a generational defection.
Crypto is nearly two decades old. The first bitcoin ETF is no longer a novelty. Tokenized treasuries are scaling faster than stablecoins did in their first years. Even the SEC is beginning to treat digital assets as a category rather than a curiosity.
And yet the average financial advisor's crypto guidance hovers somewhere between hesitant, outdated, and actively misleading. Many still frame Bitcoin as a "speculative side bet" or lump the entire sector into a volatility bucket that conveniently absolves them of responsibility.
Investors notice. And affluent investors – younger, self-directed, digitally native – have had enough.
Are there crypto advisors worth trusting? Not many, but they do exist, and they tend to share three traits:
But these advisors remain the exception. In too many wealth-management firms, crypto specialist is still code for a 28-year-old analyst who tinkers with Dune dashboards on the weekend.
And that leads to the real story: crypto investors are increasingly opting to bypass the advisory layer and educate themselves.
Call it the age of the autodidact.
Crypto's pace is incompatible with the advisory industry's rhythms. Markets trade 24/7. Protocols evolve weekly. Narratives mutate in real time. By the time an advisor publishes their quarterly outlook, half the ecosystem has forked, iterated, or disappeared.
Younger high-earning investors don't wait around. They dive into GitHub repos, compare token unlock schedules, run on-chain screens, parse validator sets. They assemble their own conviction stacks. Not because they want to — but because the professionals haven't stepped up.
The Zerohash figures reflect this shift: 76% of crypto-holding affluent investors currently manage their digital-asset exposure independently. And most say they plan to increase allocations.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: crypto's next chapter won't be led by institutionally anointed voices. It will be shaped by investors who develop their own literacy.
If investors are going to steer their own portfolios, however, they need more than enthusiasm. They need a toolkit:
• On-chain literacy.
The ability to read wallet flows, token supply dynamics, and contract-level behavior. It's the difference between investing early and becoming someone else's exit liquidity.
• Risk modeling beyond volatility.
Crypto risk isn't just about price swings. It's smart-contract exposure, custodial fragility, counterparty reliability, governance structure, and regulatory drift.
• Portfolio context.
Digital assets shouldn't float in isolation. They need to sit within a wider asset-allocation thesis: correlations, liquidity needs, taxable events, concentration risk.
• Data-discipline.
Not dashboards for dashboards' sake, but the ability to separate sentiment momentum from structural signals.
• Psychological management.
The hardest skill. Every cycle tests conviction, ego, and patience. Especially the patience.
Mastering these won’t guarantee outperformance, but it leans toward competence. And competence is the antidote to panic.
Crypto cycles turn on psychology, liquidity, and participation. When young, tech-savvy investors feel let down by advisors, they don't exit the asset class, they take control of the steering wheel. That's the part legacy finance still misunderstands: crypto's greatest export isn't tokens. It's self-reliance.
And in a moment where narratives are wobbling and prices are testing conviction, autonomy feels like strategy. Investors who know what they own are less likely to capitulate, less likely to overtrade, and less likely to outsource their decision-making to someone who doesn't understand the domain.
The Zerohash findings signal a broader redistribution of expertise away from credentialed intermediaries and toward investors willing to learn faster than the market punishes them.
Crypto has always rewarded the mavericks. Now it rewards the self-taught.
Benzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.
